One of the most hotly debated topics in Chinese language pedagogy is the question of when to introduce Chinese characters.
As a student, should you learn Chinese characters from the very start, in parallel with the spoken language, or should you delay the learning of Chinese characters and focus on the spoken language first?
And if you delay learning characters, then for how long should you delay learning them? The delay can be very short and relevant only for the content you are studying.
For example, you can first listen to a dialogue, then talk about it, and then finally read the transcript and learn to write the characters.
This is very different from delaying character learning for months or even years, becoming fluent in the spoken language before even starting to learn the written language (as native speakers do).
Tune in to the Hacking Chinese Podcast to listen to the related episode (#1 or #261).
Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube and many other platforms!
Learning to speak, read, type and handwrite Chinese characters
The question of when to introduce characters has several layers to it:
- When to start reading characters
- When to start typing characters
- When to start writing characters by hand
Most of the discussion in this article is about when to introduce characters at all, so it covers all the cases above. Since learning to write characters by hand takes much longer than just learning to read them, however, it follows that an approach that introduces reading early, but delays handwriting, slows down acquisition of the spoken language less than an approach that emphasises handwriting.
Still, this article is about delaying learning the writing system in general, not just handwriting characters. If you’re interested in handwriting specifically, I suggest you check these two articles:
What’s easy to say in Chinese is not necessarily easy to write
Furthermore, it’s not obvious which characters we’re talking about. Should they be those that are needed to write what we learn to say? Or should they be the most common characters in written Chinese? Or perhaps the most basic building blocks?
Another approach is to treat the written language as a completely separate entity, which could be learnt either in parallel with, after, or even before the spoken language. Such an approach acknowledges the fact that something easy to say is not necessarily easy to write, and if you learn to write what you learn to say, the learning curve will be very steep indeed.
Compare starting with writing characters like 我 (wǒ), “I; me”, 你 (nǐ), “you”, and 是 (shì), “to be”, which are all extremely common in spoken Chinese, with starting with basic building blocks, such as 人 (rén), “person”, 日, (rì), “sun” and 月 (yuè), “moon”, first and gradually building up to more complex characters.
In most courses, students learn to write what they learn to say, but in this article, I will focus mostly on the timing issue, rather than on whether or not you should learn to write the same words you learn to say. For an example of a course that is based on what makes sense solely based on the writing system, you can check out the character course I’ve built for Skritter, which uses this approach.
If you’re not interested in the timing issue, but rather how to learn characters in general, I suggest you head over to this article instead: My best advice on how to learn Chinese characters.
To delay learning Chinese characters…
The reason the question of delaying character learning is a hotly debated topic is that it is possible to argue either way, depending on your own opinions about the meaning and purpose of learning Chinese.
The main argument in favour of focusing on the spoken language first is that it takes a disproportionate amount of time to learn characters. If you learn how to write everything you can say, students will end up spending most of their time on the written language, which will inevitably slow down their progress in the spoken language.
…or not to delay learning Chinese characters
But it is also easy to argue the opposite and say that the written and spoken language are intertwined, and that you can’t really say you are learning a language if you only focus on one side of it. Are you learning Chinese if you’re not learning the characters?
While I have nothing but personal experience to back this up, I have a feeling that native speakers who teach Chinese voice this argument more often than non-native speakers such as myself.
Some people also claim that Chinese can’t be understood without the writing system, arguing, among other things, that communication would break down if Pinyin (a way to transcribe Chinese using the Latin alphabet) were used instead of Chinese characters. There are simply too many homonyms (words that are pronounced the same way, but mean different things).
This is nonsense if we are talking about the majority of adults who learn Chinese as a second language. It is perfectly possible to become fairly advanced in a language without knowing how to read and write, even if this comes with some problems of its own (more about this later). Homonyms don’t become a real problem until well beyond the beginner stage, and we’re talking about delaying the introduction of characters here, not skipping learning them entirely.
English also has homonyms. The sentence “I want to be there for you” consists of only homophones (“eye wont two bee their four ewe”), yet nobody would find this sentence hard to understand in context. Still, I don’t want to dismiss the problem of homophones entirely, because there are many more than in English. However, as I mentioned, this is not a significant issue for beginners, and it’s doubtful that learning characters would even help.
Beyond tīng bu dǒng, part 6: Why is listening in Chinese so hard?
Delaying Chinese character learning: A tricky topic to research
The debate is further complicated by the fact that it’s almost impossible to do empirical research to prove who’s right, because there are so many variables involved.
- How long is the delay?
- When do you start reading characters?
- What about typing?
- Or are we talking about handwriting?
- What’s the curriculum like?
- Who are the students?
- Who’s teaching them?
- What teaching method is used?
- How are they tested?
And so on.
This doesn’t mean that people haven’t tried researching this topic, of course. For an overview, see Ye (2011), whose dissertation strives to answer this question and has a comprehensive overview of the literature.
For those who want to read more, I have added more articles to the reference section at the end of this article. One thing most people seem to agree on is that delaying character learning is great for developing spoken proficiency, which we’ve already talked about and which ought to be fairly obvious.
Yes, you should delay learning Chinese characters, one way or another
In general, I think it makes sense to delay learning characters in favour of developing the spoken language first. That doesn’t have to mean that the entire process is delayed for months or years, just that you make sure you have a solid foundation in the spoken language before starting to learn characters seriously.
The problem with learning characters is that it takes too much time from other areas and will slow down your learning. The writing system is one of the main reasons that learning Chinese is difficult, and if you postpone the introduction of that obstacle, you can learn the spoken language at several times the speed.
Spending time learning characters instead of mastering pronunciation is a really bad idea, and one you will regret later. Doing the opposite, neglecting characters for some time until you have grasped pronunciation, has no serious drawbacks at all.
Once you can speak basic Chinese, learning the writing system becomes much easier as well. You now have those pesky tones and tricky initials and finals under control, freeing up mental capacity to tackle characters.
Furthermore, there is plenty of research in support of phonology playing a major role in reading Chinese, even when reading silently (see, for example, Ziegler et al., 2000). Learning to read is easier when the spoken language can support your efforts. This is also what native speakers do.
Reasons for learning Chinese characters along with the spoken language
Now that we have looked at the case for postponing characters, let’s consider the alternative, which is by far the most common approach in formal education.
There are several reasons why you might want to learn characters in parallel with the spoken language, or at least why you might not want to delay learning characters for too long.
I still don’t recommend that you learn to write everything you can say, but rather that you put some effort into character writing early on. If you put the same amount of effort into both, your reading and writing will still lag far behind your listening and speaking, which is perfectly in order.
Learning Chinese characters in parallel with the spoken language makes more sense in certain cases:
- If you’re not learning Chinese in an immersion environment, it can be difficult to find materials that support learning without using characters at all. Sure, you can find a few people to speak with, a tutor, a textbook and some podcasts, but without someone to guide you, it will be hard to rely only on the spoken language. If you study in an immersion environment or have people around you who can help you and talk to you in Chinese at your level, focusing only on spoken Chinese is doable.
- If you study Chinese anywhere near full-time, you might find it difficult to spend all your time talking to people or listening to them, especially if you’re an introverted student. Sure, you can find learning materials using only Pinyin for reading (or use tools to convert characters to Pinyin), but this is hardly practical. It will be easier to make the most of your time if you can spread the time over completely different areas, simply because it’s more varied and stimulating. This is a matter of time quality.
So, the bottom line is: Yes, you should delay character learning, at least until you have a good grasp of basic pronunciation.
This doesn’t mean that you should learn zero characters; it just means that learning characters shouldn’t take up a large proportion of your study time. Later, you can ramp up character learning as much as you want, depending on your goals for learning Chinese.
Short-term delays: Reception before production
Even if you are learning the spoken and the written language in parallel, as most of us do, you should still sequence the learning in a way that emphasises the spoken language first, and makes sure that reception comes before production. In essence, that means:
- Listen and understand before trying to learn how to speak and make yourself understood.
- Read and recognise characters before learning to write them on your own.
This results in a sequence that looks like this:
Listening → Speaking → Reading → Typing → Handwriting (optional)
Depending on what software you’re using for vocabulary learning and reviewing, this can be handled in different ways. Anki is very flexible in this regard, so I will use it for this example, but you can achieve similar results with other software, too.
There are four basic types of flashcards to consider:
- Listening – Audio on the front, the rest on the back.
- Speaking – Definition, cloze sentence or picture on the front, the rest on the back.
- Reading – Characters on the front, the rest on the back.
- Writing – Definition, cloze sentence or picture on the front, the rest on the back.
If you want to learn a bunch of words, such as key vocabulary from a story, you then go through the sequence in order. You add all four cards for each word, but suspend all except the listening card.
You then go through those words for a few days or weeks, focusing only on listening until you feel comfortable with them. After that, you activate the speaking cards and have a go at them. You then move on to reading and writing, although you can of course treat the spoken and written language separately if you prefer.
For more about flashcards and how to use them for optimal results, check the series of articles starting here: Why flashcards are great for learning Chinese
Make learning easier by focusing on reception first
This approach is helpful because it eases you into speaking and writing. It’s very hard to know how to say things correctly if you’ve never heard them before, and the same is true for writing something you haven’t seen often enough. This is particularly true for beginners, and especially when it comes to pronunciation.
To make the most of this approach, you should be at different stages in the cycle for different words, so you don’t take a batch of words and see them through the whole process before starting the next batch. Instead, you might have one set of words at each stage, adding a new set only when another set exits the process (nothing ever really ends, of course, but rather moves into long-term retention mode).
If you want to do this in class without your teacher’s explicit support, you have to start listening and reading ahead of time, making sure you’re at least a few weeks ahead of your classmates, focusing on listening and reading before you’re forced to deal with speaking and writing in class.
Sadly, many Chinese teachers force you to say things immediately after hearing about them for the first time: “Here is a sentence pattern, here is what it means and how it works, here is one example, now make your own sentence!”
Read more about why listening is more important than speaking here. This can also be applied to reading and writing, of course: Is speaking more important than listening when learning Chinese?
Is speaking more important than listening when learning Chinese?
A simpler and more natural approach to learning Chinese
A more natural way to apply the same principles is to focus heavily on comprehensible input (listening and reading) through graded readers and listening content aimed at your level. If you immerse yourself in Chinese, focusing on general understanding, you will acquire words and grammar naturally.
When you do this, it’s essential that you focus on content at the right level (i.e. not too difficult), because otherwise, you won’t see words and grammar patterns used in enough contexts. If you read a difficult chapter in a textbook, you spend a lot of time seeing just a few instances of each word, but if you spend the same amount of time reading a graded reader at the right level, you’ll be able to read ten times as many characters.
I wrote more about how to manage difficulty when listening in this article, which can also be applied to reading: The Input Pyramid: Chinese Listening for Any Situation.
Conclusion: Yes, you should focus more on the spoken language first
As I hope is clear by now, the question of when to start learning Chinese characters is complicated. It is, in fact, more complicated than I have let on here since it also touches on many other issues, including reading, typing and handwriting. My goal with this article was to provide you with an overview of the topic so that you can find an approach that suits you if you’re a student, or your students if you’re a teacher.
In my opinion, the conclusion is straightforward. For most people who aim for long-term proficiency in both spoken and written Chinese, the case for delaying characters is very strong. Focusing more on the spoken language initially has many benefits and no serious downsides. Focusing too much on the written language at the expense of the spoken language does have serious downsides.
This doesn’t mean that you should learn no characters at all as a beginner. It just means that you should avoid adopting an approach that leads to spending too much time with the written language. Learning to recognise some important characters, studying how the writing system works and even learning how to write a bit by hand is fine.
Just don’t let it take up too much valuable time from learning the spoken language.
References and further reading
Dew, J. E. (1994). Back to basics: Let’s not lose sight of what’s really important. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 29(2), 31-46.
Knell, E., & West, H. I. (2017). To delay or not to delay: The timing of Chinese character instruction for secondary learners. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 519-532.
Packard, J. L. (1990). Effects of time lag in the introduction of characters into the Chinese language curriculum. The Modern Language Journal, 74(2), 167-175.
Poole, F., & Sung, K. (2015). Three approaches to beginning Chinese instruction and their effects on oral development and character recognition. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 59-75.
Ye, L. (2011). Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language in the United States: To delay or not to delay the character introduction.
Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11(3), 234-238.





14 comments
I’ll add this as a comment as it is related to the topic, but not really relevant for most readers. This area, i.e. the relationship between spoken and written Chinese, is one the curriculum for secondary education in Sweden gets right. The general principle is that the written language is allowed to lag behind the spoken language.
This doesn’t mean you skip characters entirely, not even the first semester, it just means that as a teacher, you can be highly selective when it comes to which characters to teach. Other languages and most other curricula for Chinese do not allow for this, meaning that if the teacher follows the curriculum, students have to learn to write everything they can say.
Cool article! I have been learning Chinese for 2 months now and I am debating whether to spend the copious time needed to write the complex characters. I can do the basic radicals and I know how stroke order works. I don’t think it is worth it since I am working full time. I feel the time should be spent on oral work and learning the characters more. I feel like you would agree with what I read here. Any advice? Thanks!
Hello,
This is Jennifer. I used be to a Mandarin teacher from Confucius Institute. And I really would love to express my sincere appreciation to your dedication to Mandarin teaching.
I read some of your aticles about Mandarin teaching and learning and get inspired by it.
As for the topic you proposed, should you learn to speak Chinese before you learn Chinese characters. My opinions are as follows:
1. Learning Chinese characters is a must for beginners. Chinese in terms of its written form is a logographic language which is actually a very interesting thing for most learners around the world. It is also a good entry point to know the etymology of Chinese character when starting to learn Mandarin.
2. Learning Chinese characters will not slow down the language learning process but speed up its process since there are so many homophones in Chinese. By developing the ability of visually distinguishing and recognizing Chinese characters at the very beginning can lay a good foundation for future leaning.
3. Speaking alone cannot sastify all the communicative needs here in China. Pinyin is seldom used in our daily life. However, you can see Chinese characrs everywhere.
4. There is shortcut to every language learning, we can learn to speak within a short period of time with the Pinyin. But if the course designed to also give studetns access to Chinese characters will make this shortcut more effective.
5. It is very important to plan the couse based on students’ learning goals and learning habits. Some of my adult students even told me that writing Chinese characers and memorizing Chinese characters are way easier and more interesting than merely learning pinyin alone.
I hope my opnions above will also give you some insights about Chinese learning. Should you have any questions, please let me know via my e-mail zhifengwang@outlook.com
Hi,
Thank you for posting your thoughts on the matter! You highlight a few things I didn’t address directly in the article (mostly because it was already a bit too long), so I think this is a good opportunity to address some of them. I’ll respond argument for argument:
I’m not saying that beginners should not learn characters, only that the emphasis should be on the spoken language, especially pronunciation. Characters being interesting is a reason to learn them, but doesn’t really change the overall argument as I’m not claiming that beginners should not learn characters at all.
I don’t think this is true if you consider progress in the spoken language only, because writing takes up a large proportion of the available time and not bothering with it for some time frees up so much time that can be spent on the spoken language instead. Most university students I teach who are required to learn both in parallel complain that they spend almost all their time writing, which is the reason their speaking and listening falls behind. This also matches my own experience and that of almost every other student I’ve talked to, as well as all research I could find on the topic (see Poole & Sung, 2015; Packard, 1990; and Dew, 1994 for example).
As for homophones, that’s mostly a problem on the syllable level, not on the word level. How many homophones can you come up with that a beginner would run into? And even though there are homophones, I don’t really see the problem. If we compare with English, the sentence “I want to be there” consists of only homonyms (“eye wont two bee their”), and yet no one would say that this sentence has to be written down to be learnt.
I do agree that this becomes a problem later when character-level (and therefore syllable-level) knowledge becomes important, such as for figuring out near synonyms or abbreviations of various kinds, but none of this is relevant for beginners.
No one has claimed that it would! This article is not about whether or not to teach characters, it’s about whether or not to delay character learning a bit to focus on the spoken language first.
I agree that characters should be taught, but again, the article is about delaying character learning, not getting rid of it.
This, I think, is the most important argument against delaying character learning for too long. Many students, not just adult students, choose to learn Chinese precisely because they like the characters. If you then tell them, sorry no, you have to wait six months for that, some of them are going to lose interest. In these cases, I would advocate a selective approach where you teach Chinese characters and how the writing system works, but you still don’t require them to learn to write everything they can say.
My point is that you can satisfy the desire to learn Chinese characters without going all-in and requiring them to learn to write everything.
Best wishes,
Olle
-In theory, each word you learn can have four different flashcards:
Listening – Audio on the front, the rest on the back
Speaking – Definition, cloze sentence or picture on the front, the rest on the back
Reading – Characters on the front, the rest on the back
Writing – Definition, cloze sentence or picture on the front, the rest on the back
Should the flashcard (Anki for example) be set in a way that for Speaking it expects me to pronounce the character and check my pronunciation? Is that even possible in Anki?
I would like to know something:
I’ve been learning for three and a half months, and from day one my teacher has been exposition us to characters. As we progress, she uses less and less pinyin, and sometimes only when introducing a new word or a new character, and I love her approach.
I do a massive amount of listening, reading, shadowing, and flashcards on my own, and I’m now able to read level 1 graded readers and understand a lot of what’s said in children’s tales and such. So far, I’ve put zero effort into handwriting, but I do type a lot on my computer and phone (doing internet searches, leaving comments on social media, writing sentences and words that I want to study later).
So, it confuses me a little that you don’t make a distinction between handwriting, or rather, that you don’t really mention typing as a form of writing, which is really a separate skill. To me, this approach of only using electronic devices to write almost from day one has proven effective, and I don’t feel like it’s making me compromise the other parts of my learning.
I’m a professional wishing to remotely communicate with coworkers in China, both via email and video conferencing (mostly email, though), so does it make sense where I’m coming from? What are your thoughts?
Love your articles, by the way!
This is a very late reply to your question; I must have missed it when you posted it and only found it now when I was updating the article for other reasons. I’ll still answer in case other people are interested, though, or if you’re still interested five years later.
Typing and reading falls somewhere between focusing only on the spoken language and writing everything by hand. I still prefer to focus mostly on the spoken language early on for the reasons given in this article, but when characters are introduced, it should definitely be mostly in the way you describe. This is something I have written quite a lot about elsewhere, including in more recent articles such as this one: Chinese character learning for all students.
Can i do the opposite ???
You advised against this method (in another article) because it usually neglecte the phonetic components in most Chinese characters.
I’m learning characters by their phonetic components (using the Outlier dictionary).
So i guess there’s no reason why i shouldn’t learn Chinese by learning the written part first, right ??
Particularly since if i did so, it will make it easier for me to focus on the tones (when i start learning spoken Chinese later on),, because by then, i will be familiar with many of the syllables/toneless pinyin.
I’m only fascinated by the characters, so i hope this method works.
Thanks.
If your main goal is to read, then you can certainly do that! I’m mostly talking about people who want to learn all aspects of the language here. Tones aren’t very important when it comes to characters, because they are rarely preserved in phonetic components anyway (in fact, Chinese hasn’t always been tonal either, so many characters were created when there were no tones).
Yes, my primary goal is to master reading.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
When I started to learn Chinese I took a very unorthodox approach. I studied characters for years, before beginning to study actual phrases in written Chinese, and before beginning to speak or to pronounce, or even to listen spoken Chinese.
For various reasons this approach did not work for me. One reason is that I ended up having to imagine clearly every single character in my mind while speaking, which is impossible. This approach delayed for years my acquisition of all the other skills needed to speak a language. I had to painstakingly “deconstruct” all that I had learned and I had to begin again from zero. In the short term, I was able to read a novel in Chinese after one year of an intensive course in Chinese (focused more on reading and writing than speaking), but I was not able to buy apples smoothly in the market (this example is real). In the long term I am not even sure that this approach helped to recognize more characters.
Don’t try this at home.
Thank you for sharing! I think the most important thing is to study according to one’s goals. If one wants to read and/or write, then focus on the written language; if one wants to listen/speak, then focus on the spoken language. If a balanced competence is desired, then mix both. This ought to be obvious, but far too often, courses and teachers impose a syllabus very heavy on reading and writing, even if students want to learn the spoken language too.
I just became interested in Chinese TV dramas but have had to stop them often in order to read the English translation. I would like to learn to understand the spoken language so I can watch the dramas without bothering with closed caption English translations.
Since I am 70 years old and never likely to travel to China I don’t believe I have the time or inclination to learn to write the characters. Thank you for your thoughts.
How much do you understand right now? I generally recommend that you spend a majority of your time with materials you can mostly make sense of unaided. You don’t mention how much Chinese you know already, so it’s hard to give more specific advice. You can safely ignore characters up to at least an intermediate level.