- Welcome!
- Blog (recent articles)
- Ask a question
- HC elsewhere
- Archive
- Beginner
- Intermediate
- Advanced
- Attitude and mentality
- Key study hacks
- Organising and planning
- Learning outside class
- Learning in class
- Immersion and integration
- Distinctively Chinese
- Recommended resources
- Science and research
- Listening
- Speaking
- Reading
- Writing
- Vocabulary
- Essential articles
- Twitter archive
- About
Most learners of Chinese soon realise that available dictionaries have some serious problems. This is mostly true for Chinese-English (and English-Chinese) dictionaries, but it’s also true for Chinese-Chinese dictionaries (in short, they don’t work very well for learners). This article isn’t about the problem itself though, but how to overcome it. If you want to read about the issue, I suggest you head over to Albert Wolfe’s article about the shortcomings of CE dictionaries.
Image credit: sxc.hu/profile/Lockheed
I have studied Chinese for some time now and have used a number of difference dictionaries. The bad news is that I still haven’t found a good dictionary that can do everything I want it to do, but the good news is that I have found several different dictionaries that among them can handle most of the questions I have.
In this article, I will share with you my favourite dictionaries, including why I think they are good, what I use them for and what drawbacks they (all) have. I also hope that you might give me suggestions of dictionaries that might replace those I list below. Note that I’m not looking for dictionaries that can do things that those below can already do well.
My goal here isn’t to give you a list of all available dictionaries. In fact, I have tried to keep the list as short as possible (it’s still quite long). This is because I know most learners are after simple and effective solutions. People who really want to explore other dictionaries will do that without my having to write about it.
This article about digital resources, so even if I mention offline dictionaries, they are still digital. I haven’t used enough paper dictionaries to evaluate them properly and most learners don’t bother with paper dictionaries today anyway.
I have sorted these sources into the following categories:
- Online dictionaries mainly relying on English
- Online dictionaries mainly relying on Chinese
- Online dictionaries for traditional Chinese
- Offline dictionaries you should check out
- Online corpora and other sentence sources
Online dictionaries mainly relying on English
- MDBG
What I use it for: This is my default dictionary in this category
Pros: Clean interface, easy to use, handwriting recognition, stroke order, sound
Cons: Sometimes inadequate English definitions (true for most dictionaries, though) - Zhongwen.com
What I use it for: Etymology, character components, horizontal character learning
Pros: Click on any character part to view that component, good etymology in English
Cons: Horrible interface, characters as pictures rather than text you can copy - Arch Chinese
What I use it for: Character components, collocations, word frequency
Pros: Offers related characters and words sorted by frequency (this is awesome)
Cons: None, really, this site is great in general - HanziCraft
What I use it for: Breaking down characters for sensible character learning
Pros: Very easy to use, integrates well, very fast
Cons: Is still quite new, I haven’t found too many problems though - Yellow Bridge
What I use it for: Same as above
Pros: Reasonably quick look-up, all information in a tree structure
Cons: Need to log in for full details (I don’t use that feature, though), much slower than HanziCraft - I Cha Cha
What I use it for: Academic and/or specialist jargon, fixed expressions
Pros: Provides parallel translations, contains many expressions that don’t appear in dictionaries
Cons: Horrible amounts of ads and possibly other toxic stuff, be careful!
Online dictionaries mainly relying on Chinese
- Zdic
What I use it for: This is my main Chinese-Chinese non-traditional dictionary
Pros: Comprehensive, detailed definitions, English, very detailed single-character information
Cons: None, really, this is my favourite online Chinese-Chinese dictionary - Baidu Dictionary
What I use it for: Idioms, fixed expressions, other things I can’t find in other dictionaries
Pros: User-edited, so very comprehensive (think Wikipedia), usually easier than formal dictionaries
Cons: User-edited, so quality varies, but usually very good
Online dictionaries mainly relying on Chinese (only traditional)
- Chinese spell checker
What I use it for: Check the use of character variations in different words
Pros: The above feature is unique as far as I know, incredibly useful
Cons: None, really, this site fulfils its function pretty well - Character variant dictionary
What I use if tor: Sort out character variants (obviously)
Pros: This site is indispensable for independent advanced learners
Cons: It’s sometimes a bit confusing and doesn’t always give clear answers - Taiwan Ministry of Education Chinese Dictionary
What I use it for: Look up words I can’t find anywhere else, single character information
Pros: Comprehensive and detailed
Cons: Archaic examples, hard definitions, too detailed (this is not beginner-friendly at all) - Taiwan Ministry of Education Elementary School Dictionary
What I use it for: Single-character definitions and collocations in Chinese
Pros: Easier to understand than its bigger cousin (see above)
Cons: Only has single-characters - Taiwan Ministry of Education Character Stroke Order Dictionary
What I use it for: Check stroke order, check the current writing standard in Taiwan
Pros: Detailed, well-structured, comprehensive
Cons: None, really, it does the job pretty well
Offline dictionaries you should check out
- Pleco
What I use it for:Everything on the move, this is all you need, really
Pros: Excellent handwriting input, OCR input, flashcards, excellent dictionaries
Cons: Some functions aren’t free - Wenlin
What I use it for: I don’t use it very much (see below), but I would if I could
Pros: More academic/professional than most other alternatives
Cons: It costs money, you can’t access it online, not available for all platforms
Online corpora and other sentence sources
- Jukuu
What I use it for: Sentence mining, gathering large volumes of examples
Pros: Contains a large number of sentences
Cons: Sometimes hard to find actual sentences, some results are either only words or fragments - Iciba
What I use it for: Similar to Jukuu above
Pros: Contains a large number of sentences
Cons: The English translations are horrible, don’t trust them more than you would trust Google translate. - Nciku
What I use it for: Same as above; has fewer but in general better sentences
Pros: Higher quality sentences with much better translations (reliable English in many cases)
Cons: Lacks examples of uncommon words and sometimes have too few sentences to find the usage I’m after - LCMC
What I use it for: Collocations, mostly
Pros: Is a real, tokenised corpus, very big
Cons: Hard to use if you’re not used to corpus research - Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese
What I use it for: Most queries about traditional Chinese or Mandarin usage in Taiwan
Pros: Is a real, tokenised corpus
Cons: Only covers Taiwan, not big enough at times - Google
What I use it for: Anything I can’t find using the other sources I’ve listed above
Pros: Mindbogglingly high number of sentences
Cons: Hard to find what you’re looking for, hard to be sure that what you find is actually a good example
That’s all for now, I think. If you have any suggestions for how to improve this list by replacing any dictionary with one which is strictly better, let me know! Remember, though, this isn’t an attempt to gather as many dictionaries as possible, but rather to list the best dictionaries for specific purposes. I will keep the list updated as I find better alternatives, please help!
Please consider supporting Hacking Chinese so that I can keep providing free content.
Very interesting, thanks. I’ll propose you another one very useful to follow the pictographic evolution of characters.
http://www.vividict.com/
From 甲骨文. I like that one too.
Regards,
The dictionary doesn’t even work for me, I’ve tried both in Firefox and Chrome. I just get blank results for whatever I put in.
At first I thought, 21 dictionaries, that’s a lot! Then after reading I realised I also use about 90% of these.
http://www.kwuntung.net/check/ is a nice find, will check this out.
What about Dr. Eye? Pros and Cons? I paid for it, but only use it at work for Chinese input…
I haven’t used it, actually. I heard some people recommend it when I first came to Taiwan more than four years ago, but I haven’t heard a single recommendation since then.
Hi Olle!
Great post, thanks for sharing such valuable resources! I’ve added quite a few to my bookmarks for reference later.
There’s a fairly new mobile app out that contains entries from the Taiwan Ministry of Education Chinese Dictionary for both Android and iOS called 「萌典」. I wrote about it here.
Feel free to take a look, I think it’s quite handy–and it’s free. You can find it by searching 「萌典」 or MoeDict.
I’ll check it out, certainly looks good, especially if the offline version works okay.
Interesting article :-)
Personally I only use Pleco and Nciku (and Google sometimes).
Most of my example sentences come from Chinesepod (from the Expansion feature) and from books/TV shows I’m reading/watching.
What about good old Wikipedia? Though limited in it’s usefulness, sometimes I know how to express an idea in English, but an not sure how to express it in Chinese, and it’s not in dictionaries, but I can find it in Wikipedia. One example – I used Wikipedia to find out that the way to say ‘Battle of the Bay’ in Chinese is 灣區大橋大戰 (and a Taiwanese baseball fan later confirmed that this is correct).
Yes, Wikipedia should probably be on the list. I’ll wait a while before I make any edits. If I can remove Yellow Bridge, then I can add Wikipedia without having to change the title. :) I use Wikipedia for vocabulary quite a lot, I just forgot to include it for some reason.
[...] Google Для чего используем: Поиск всего, чего не могли найти с помощью словарей перечисленных выше. Плюсы: Огромное число результатов по любым запросам. Минусы: Трудно найти то, что ты на самом деле ищешь. А также не всегда хорошие примеры использования слов могут выдаваться в первых результатах. — По мотивам [...]
Thanks for the great list! Made our list with additions based on your post here http://magazeta.com/2013/03/20dicts/
So useful! I just recommended it to my students on facebook. Thank you for putting this together.
And thank you for sharing!
Really useful stuff to mine here! Thanks for your generosity in sharing this, Olle.
Anyone have suggestions of a good source for synonymns of words, or a thesaurus in Chinese?
I normally use the Taiwan MoE dictionary for that. They include near-synonyms and so on. Figuring out which of these synonyms can be used when is different question and a very hard one at that. I have an article planned about that, but it will take some time before it goes online.
Etymology : http://www.vividict.com/ and http://www.chineseetymology.org
Chinese to chinese, nothing is better than Xinhua Zidian : http://xh.5156edu.com/
Thanks for this article, really interesting!
Cédric
Can you explain what’s so groat about tha Xinhua Zidian? It looks fairly limited. It give much less information than Zdic and you can only look up single characters? Why would I use it instead of Zdic?
I’m definitely going to include some etymology dictionary, I need to think a bit before deciding which one. Thanks for both your suggestions!
An excellent list.
Pleco has the best user interface for a PDA, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.
Because of this, I care a Palm Zire72 with PlecoDict everywhere I go. If the answer isn’t in one of its dictionaries (it has Oxford dictionaries and others that are occasionally upgraded), you can add terms.
The fact that I can keep the device in my shirt pocket, and not in a bag or backpack means that I work with it far more than any other gadget dictionary.
I have had several Besta electronic Chinese-English-Chinese dictionaries and no longer will buy them as the user interface is terrible. They just don’t understand how important a good user interface is.
You seem to have not listed the lexicons from Tuttle Publishing that have been around for a very long time. And I have few lexicons of Hong Kong origins that seemed to have been created by Catholic institutions. Many of these are very useful for everyday terminology.
I am not at my desk, so I can’t provide titles and authors at this time. The Taiwanese approach is different than Tuttle or the Catholics, more academic.
Thanks for sharing this list. I’ve never heard arch Chinese before. It appears to be a great site to learn Chinese characters.
-Jeff
It’s actually quite a new find for me as well, but it’s really good. I especially like that the “see this component/character in other characters” bit is sorted according to frequency. As a beginner, it’s hard to know what to learn when in horizontal learning mode, so this is a great too.
It might be useful to collate and publish a list of publishers of Chinese to English study materials.
There are a limited number of these.
Taiwan seems to have several out of Taipei.
The Catholic Church seems to publish out of Hong Kong
Yale’s Far Eastern Studies has been a long time contributor
Oxford publishes
Mainland China has its own publishing effort
University of California at Berkeley publishes.
Oberlin Univerisy may have something.
US government publishes a Mandarin cource via the Monertery Language Institute
Tuttle is a private publisher
The point is that there are far less publishers that there are publications and each publisher has a particular approach to teaching Chinese.
Some are very commercial and exploitive, others are very generous and practical. And of course, there is a big division between the Mainland’s Simplified Chinese and Taiwan and Hong Kong’s Traditional Chinese.
There are also religious undertones in the publishing world as missionaries that were going to China were a big market for Chinese language studies.
This is a good idea and something I might return to later when I actually start teaching normal courses (if I ever do, that is). In that case, I’ll need to check out textbooks myself and that would be the perfect opportunity for this. At the moment, though, it’s probably too inconvenient to get hold of the different materials and it would be hard to agree on a standard against which we can benchmark them. I’ll probably return to this later, though, thanks for the idea!
I actually prefer quite a few texts that are out of print and use Abe Books to locate them on a global basis.
With the advent of computers and full color publishing, the publishers became very graphic oriented and very greedy. So they added a lot more photos and diagrams and color in order to justify a higher price. They also began to make it necessary to buy the text (that was divided into more and more books), the workbook, the CDs, and maybe even the teacher’s text to get the full content.
This had been a disaster for the isolated learner as there has been a lot more fluff in the content, and a much greater outlay of cash.
Oxford does something similar with their Chinese-English-Chinese dictionaries. You just can’t buy one with everything in it.
In sum, there are good publishers that don’t abuse students and teachers, and there are out of print texts that are actually better than the newer items. One can really learn conversational Chinese faster with an original edition of Tewksbury from Yale than with what Yale is now selling.
Sadly it is all about greed for more revene creating unnecessary new editions and new authors trying to survive the publish or perish policy of modern universities.
there are some fantastic free windows desktop tools to download from this site http://www.chineselearners.net just go to the downloads page and download the tools, all is free and it is as powerful as a lot of comercial packages.
I’m often surprised how Pleco is preferred to Hanping Pro: the latter has a cleaner interface and the preferences can be adjusted to provide only full-form (“traditional”) characters, which I prefer. The provider is also very responsive, although I understand that so is the provider of Pleco. (I also have this, but it’s secondary to Hanping Pro.) The real bugbear with Pleco, though, apart from the apparent inability to exclude the simplified characters, is the cluttered interface – there is just too much screenspace taken up with controls. That’s not a big deal on a tablet, but on a (normal-sized) phone… Of course, maybe I’m fussy, since those of us over our mid-40s or so are more demanding, due to changing eyesight. At any rate, I would definitely include Hanping Pro in a list of useful offline dictionaries.
It seems like I can’t use the latest Hanping Pro even if I was offered to try it out; my phone is too old! I don’t find the interface in Pleco very crowded and my phone is old and my eyesight is bad. The biggest reason I use Pleco is probably the amazingly accurate handwriting input (you can basically write how sloppily you want as long as the stroke order is correct). I’ve tried writing complex character with only dots instead of strokes and it still works. Perhaps Hanping can do that, too, I’ll need to check it out, but that might have to wait until I buy a new phone. :(
I have never heard of Haming Pro before. But then I started with Pleco many years ago.
Pleco can also be adjusted to be traditional only – Settings / General / Traditional Characters, then set Headword Character Set to “One Set Only.”
Regarding crowded controls – where specifically are you finding them too crowded? The bar at the bottom of the search screen can easily be turned off (Settings / Dictionary / Main Screen Interface / Portrait / Show quick input bar), though most people seem to like having it on to save the finger trip up to the search bar. The definition screens in both apps have a toolbar at the top and a toolbar at the bottom.
Oh, and OCR input for almost anything is really inferior to an interface for copying – unless you’re doing it for laughs, that is. :-D