- Welcome!
- Blog (recent articles)
- Ask a question
- HC elsewhere
- Archive
- Beginner
- Intermediate
- Advanced
- Attitude and mentality
- Key study hacks
- Organising and planning
- Learning outside class
- Learning in class
- Immersion and integration
- Distinctively Chinese
- Recommended resources
- Science and research
- Listening
- Speaking
- Reading
- Writing
- Vocabulary
- Essential articles
- Twitter archive
- About
Learning efficiently vs. learning quickly
By Olle Linge On January 22, 2012 · 5 Comments · In About Hacking Chinese, Advanced, Attitude and mentality, Beginner, Intermediate, Organising and planning
Lately, the internet has been buzzing with discussions about learning Chinese quickly (in three months, to be more precise). This is obviously not the first time people have been discussing learning languages quickly, and each time the discussion starts, someone asks a question which might seem stupid to some people, but which still is a genuine and legitimate question:
Why do we want to learn a language quickly anyway?
I always stress that our main motivation for learning (at least in the short-term) should be pleasure. We should strive to find ways of studying we thoroughly enjoy, because only then will we be able to spend enough time to reach our long-term goals. Also, leading this kind of life is far more enjoyable than cramming in things you don’t really enjoy.

Image credit: world.werner-kunz.com
Enjoying is learning.
So, if the goal is to enjoy ourselves, why is it important to learn a language quickly? Well, we might have extrinsic reasons for wanting to learn the language. Perhaps we want to be able to communicate with Chinese-speaking people where we live, or we plan to find a job where proficiency in Chinese is necessary. In this case, the quicker we learn Chinese, the better.
The quicker the better? Really?
Writing the last sentence of the previous paragraph, I felt bad. Having that kind of attitude towards language learning is counter-productive and harmful to any kind of long-term learning. We might be able to force ourselves to reach limited success in learning a language, but if we hope to master Chinese, we really have to like what we’re doing.
Still, these are real questions and not everyone has the same idealistic approach to language learning. There is a way to reconcile these two standpoints, which involves stopping using the work “quick” and start using the word “efficient” instead.
Learn Chinese efficiently
Hacking Chinese is about learning Chinese efficiently (this is indeed the core of language hacking). The definition of efficient is that you gain a lot per unit of time. The goal of learning languages efficiently is something I think we all share, even though we may have different ideas about what is efficient. Who want to spend twice the time to learn the same number of characters, for instance? On this website, I mainly write about how to make the most of your studies, how to overcome problems and save time. I write about efficiency, not speed.
Not an arbitrary difference
But wait, isn’t this just a different way of saying the same thing? Is there really a difference between efficient learning and quick learning? Yes, I think there is, and it’s far from arbitrary. Here’s why “efficient” is a much better word than “quick”:
- Efficient emphasises on solid learning for the long term, quick is more about shortcuts that might actually come back to haunt you later
- Efficient is desirable for every single learner out there, including those who study part time in their home country; quick mostly applies to people immersed in the environment with strong external goals
- Efficient is a wider concept that includes learning finer nuances, whereas quick smacks of sloppiness
- Efficient focuses on the road, quick mostly on the destination (or the time it takes to get there)
- Efficient is useful for those who desire speed, but quick is not necessarily helpful for those who strive for efficiency
Let me finish by highlighting the last of the points above. Note that the methods that can be used to learn Chinese efficiently are in essence the same as those that can be employed to learn the language quickly. This means that most of the things I’ve written are helpful for anyone, regardless of why you want to learn or what your goals are. Put simply, learning efficiently is always good, whereas learning quickly isn’t necessarily always a a good thing. My wish is that people stop staring blindly at speed and start focusing on efficiency instead, because after all learning Chinese quickly is just a matter of doing it efficiently, combined with investing lots of time.
Please consider supporting Hacking Chinese so that I can keep providing free content.
5 Responses to Learning efficiently vs. learning quickly
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Weekly newsletter
Table of Contents
Welcome!
Essential articles
Beginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Vocabulary
Listening
Speaking
Reading
Writing
Attitude and mentality
Organising and planning
Key study hacks
Learning in class
Learning outside class
Immersion and integration
Distinctively Chinese
Recommended resources
Science and research
A chronological list of all posts
An alphabetical list of all tags
About Hacking ChineseTwitter
Recent Comments
- Sean on Don’t use mnemonics for everything
- Sean on Adding tone marks (w/o Pinyin) above characters to practise tones
- David Lloyd-Jones on Want to master Chinese in no time? Start dreaming!*
- Olle Linge on Using Audacity to learn Chinese (speaking and listening)
- Olle Linge on Using Audacity to learn Chinese (speaking and listening)
Recent Posts
- Using Audacity to learn Chinese (speaking and listening)
- Adding tone marks (w/o Pinyin) above characters to practise tones
- Hacking Chinese meet-up in Taipei 2013-05-12
- You might be too lazy to learn Chinese, but you’re not too old
- Immersion at home or: Why you don’t have to go abroad to learn Chinese
Article tags
Anki Attitude Being corrected Benchmarking Challenge Character components Characters Culture Diversified learning Efficiency Friends Goals Grammar Handwriting HSK Immersion Language exchange Leeches Listening strategies Manga memory Micro goals Mistakes Mnemonics Motivation Music Native speakers passive listening Planning Pronunciation Radicals Recording Reviews Rote learning Sensible character learning Short-term goals Skritter Spaced repetition software SRS Teachers Tones Toolkit Vocabulary Words Zhongwen.com





All good points. Aren’t Benny’s methods (the source of all this quick Chinese learning discussion) all about the efficiency you describe? Shortcuts aren’t necessarily bad. If there’s nothing to be gained on the longer route then the shortcut is the efficient option. Benny does take a lot of shortcuts, but as far as I can see they’re well considered with the goal of efficiency and not just speed.
In essence, I think you are right. Most of the methods he uses to increase speed are increases in efficiency that would work for people who don’t have a three-month mission to accomplish (note that I have stated several times that I actually quite like what Benny is doing in general). I wrote this post not to say that learning quickly is by definition something bad, but that people who only think like that might run into some problems. I’m not saying that applied to Benny, because I’m quite sure he knows what he’s doing. Instead, I’m writing this to counterbalance the recent focus on X months etc.. I want to say that these methods are useful even if you spend ten years learning Chinese to the same level as Benny plans to do. This should be obvious, but I don’t think it is.
[...] writing characters beautifully or perfectly is not. So why is perfectionism so bad? Because it is inefficient. Spending too much time on something might mean that you spend less time on widening your horizons [...]
[...] is about sorting language problems and then apply the correct solution to them, with the goal of learning more efficiently. This might look like a trivial problem at first. It [...]
[...] repetition means that you review words you want to learn at certain intervals to maximise learning efficiency. It is a well known psychological phenomenon that repetition is much more efficient when spread out [...]